Madinat al-Muslimeen Islamic Message Board

A R C H I V E S

The great charade article by John Pilger

Madina Archives


Madinat al-Muslimeen Islamic Message Board

The great charade article by John Pilger
Anonymous
11/07/02 at 08:32:34
http://www.observer.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4461028,00.html

The great charade
As the West prepares for an assault on Iraq, John Pilger argues that 'war on terror' is a
smokescreen created by the ultimate terrorist ... America itself

War on Iraq? Discuss it here

John Pilger
Sunday July 14, 2002
The Observer

It is 10 months since 11 September, and still the great charade plays on. Having
appropriated our shocked response to that momentous day, the rulers of the world have since
ground our language into a paean of cliches and lies about the 'war on terrorism' - when the
most enduring menace, and source of terror, is them.

The fanatics who attacked America came from Saudi Arabia and Egypt. No bombs fell on
these American protectorates. Instead, more than 5,000 civilians have been bombed to death in
stricken Afghanistan, the latest a wedding party of 40 people, mostly women and children.
Not a single al-Qaeda leader of importance has been caught.

Following this 'stunning victory', hundreds of prisoners were shipped to an American
concentration camp in Cuba, where they have been held against all the conventions of war and
international law. No evidence of their alleged crimes has been produced, and the FBI
confirms only one is a genuine suspect. In the United States, more than 1,000 people of
Muslim background have 'disappeared'; none has been charged. Under the draconian Patriot Act,
the FBI's new powers include the authority to go into libraries and ask who is reading
what.

Meanwhile, the Blair government has made fools of the British Army by insisting they
pursue warring tribesmen: exactly what squaddies in putties and pith helmets did over a
century ago when Lord Curzon, Viceroy of India, described Afghanistan as one of the 'pieces on
a chessboard upon which is being played out a great game for the domination of the
world'.

There is no war on terrorism; it is the great game speeded up. The difference is the
rampant nature of the superpower, ensuring infinite dangers for us all.

Having swept the Palestinians into the arms of the supreme terrorist Ariel Sharon, the
Christian Right fundamentalists running the plutocracy in Washington, now replenish their
arsenal in preparation for an attack on the 22 million suffering people of Iraq. Should
anyone need reminding, Iraq is a nation held hostage to an American-led embargo every bit
as barbaric as the dictatorship over which Iraqis have no control. Contrary to propaganda
orchestrated from Washington and London, the coming attack has nothing to do with Saddam
Hussein's 'weapons of mass destruction', if these exist at all. The reason is that
America wants a more compliant thug to run the world's second greatest source of oil.

The drum-beaters rarely mention this truth, and the people of Iraq. Everyone is Saddam
Hussein, the demon of demons. Four years ago, the Pentagon warned President Clinton that an
all-out attack on Iraq might kill 'at least' 10,000 civilians: that, too, is
unmentionable. In a sustained propaganda campaign to justify this outrage, journalists on both sides
of the Atlantic have been used as channels, 'conduits', for a stream of rumours and lies.
These have ranged from false claims about an Iraqi connection with the anthrax attacks in
America to a discredited link between the leader of the 11 September hijacks and Iraqi
intelligence. When the attack comes, these consorting journalists will share responsibility
for the crime.

It was Tony Blair who served notice that imperialism's return journey to respectability
was under way. Hark, the Christian gentleman-bomber's vision of a better world for 'the
starving, the wretched, the dispossessed, the ignorant, those living in want and squalor
from the deserts of northern Africa to the slums of Gaza to the mountain ranges of
Afghanistan.' Hark, his 'abiding' concern for the 'human rights of the suffering women of
Afghanistan' as he colluded with Bush who, as the New York Times reported, 'demanded the
elimination of truck convoys that provide much of the food and other supplies to Afghanistan's
civilian population'. Hark his compassion for the 'dispossessed' in the 'slums of Gaza',
where Israeli gunships, manufactured with vital British parts, fire their missiles into
crowded civilian areas.

As Frank Furedi reminds us in The New Ideology of Imperialism , it is not long ago 'that
the moral claims of imperialism were seldom questioned in the West. Imperialism and the
global expansion of the western powers were represented in unambiguously positive terms as
a major contributor to human civilisation.' The quest went wrong when it was clear that
fascism was imperialism, too, and the word vanished from academic discourse. In the best
Stalinist tradition, imperialism no longer existed. Today, the preferred euphemism is
'civilisation'; or if an adjective is required, 'cultural'.

From Italy's Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, an ally of crypto-fascists, to impeccably
liberal commentators, the new imperialists share a concept whose true meaning relies on a
xenophobic or racist comparison with those who are deemed uncivilised, culturally
inferior and might challenge the 'values' of the West. Watch the 'debates' on Newsnight. The
question is how best 'we' can deal with the problem of 'them'.

For much of the western media, especially those commentators in thrall to and neutered by
the supercult of America, the most salient truths remain taboos. Professor Richard Falk,
of Cornell university, put it succinctly some years ago. Western foreign policy, he
wrote, is propagated in the media 'through a self righteous, one-way moral/legal screen [with]
positive images of western values and innocence portrayed as threatened, validating a
campaign of unrestricted violence'.

Perhaps the most important taboo is the longevity of the United States as both a
terrorist state and a haven for terrorists. That the US is the only state on record to have been
condemned by the World Court for international terrorism (in Nicaragua) and has vetoed a
UN Security Council resolution calling on governments to observe international law, is
unmentionable.

'In the war against terrorism,' said Bush from his bunker following 11 September, 'we're
going to hunt down these evil-doers wherever they are, no matter how long it takes.'

Strictly speaking, it should not take long, as more terrorists are given training and
sanctuary in the United States than anywhere on earth. They include mass murderers,
torturers, former and future tyrants and assorted international criminals. This is virtually
unknown to the American public, thanks to the freest media on earth.

There is no terrorist sanctuary to compare with Florida, currently governed by the
President's brother, Jeb Bush. In his book Rogue State , former senior State Department
official Bill Blum describes a typical Florida trial of three anti-Castro terrorists, who
hijacked a plane to Miami at knifepoint. 'Even though the kidnapped pilot was brought back from
Cuba to testify against the men,' he wrote, 'the defence simply told the jurors the man
was lying, and the jury deliberated for less than an hour before acquitting the
defendants.'

General Jose Guillermo Garcia has lived comfortably in Florida since the 1990s. He was
head of El Salvador's military during the 1980s when death squads with ties to the army
murdered thousands of people. General Prosper Avril, the Haitian dictator, liked to display
the bloodied victims of his torture on television. When he was overthrown, he was flown
to Florida by the US Government. Thiounn Prasith, Pol Pot's henchman and apologist at the
United Nations, lives in New York. General Mansour Moharari, who ran the Shah of Iran's
notorious prisons, is wanted in Iran, but untroubled in the United States.

Al-Qaeda's training camps in Afghanistan were kindergartens compared with the world's
leading university of terrorism at Fort Benning in Georgia. Known until recently as the
School of the Americas, it trained tyrants and some 60,000 Latin American special forces,
paramilitaries and intelligence agents in the black arts of terrorism.

In 1993, the UN Truth Commission on El Salvador named the army officers who had committed
the worst atrocities of the civil war; two-thirds of them had been trained at Fort
Benning. In Chile, the school's graduates ran Pinochet's secret police and three principal
concentration camps. In 1996, the US government was forced to release copies of the school's
training manuals, which recommended blackmail, torture, execution and the arrest of
witnesses' relatives.

In recent months, the Bush regime has torn up the Kyoto treaty, which would ease global
warming, to which the United States is the greatest contributor. It has threatened the use
of nuclear weapons in 'pre-emptive' strikes (a threat echoed by Defence Minister Geoffrey
Hoon). It has tried to abort the birth of an international criminal court. It has further
undermined the United Nations by blocking a UN investigation of the Israeli assault on a
Palestinian refugee camp; and it has ordered the Palestinians to replace their elected
leader with an American stooge. At summit conferences in Canada and Indonesia, Bush's
people have blocked hundreds of millions of dollars going to the most deprived people on
earth, those without clean water and electricity.

These facts will no doubt beckon the inane slur of 'anti-Americanism'. This is the
imperial prerogative: the last refuge of those whose contortion of intellect and morality
demands a loyalty oath. As Noam Chomsky has pointed out, the Nazis silenced argument and
criticism with 'anti German' slurs. Of course, the United States is not Germany; it is the
home of some of history's greatest civil rights movements, such as the epic movement in the
1960s and 1970s.

I was in the US last week and glimpsed that other America, the one rarely seen among the
media and Hollywood stereotypes, and what was clear was that it was stirring again. The
other day, in an open letter to their compatriots and the world, almost 100 of America's
most distinguished names in art, literature and education wrote this:

'Let it not be said that people in the United States did nothing when their government
declared a war without limit and instituted stark new measures of repression. We believe
that questioning, criticism and dissent must be valued and protected. Such rights are
always contested and must be fought for. We, too, watched with shock the horrific events of
September 11. But the mourning had barely begun when our leaders launched a spirit of
revenge. The government now openly prepares to wage war on Iraq - a country that has no
connection with September 11.

'We say this to the world. Too many times in history people have waited until it was too
late to resist. We draw on the inspiration of those who fought slavery and all those
other great causes of freedom that began with dissent. We call on all like-minded people
around the world to join us.'

It is time we joined them.

· This is a revised extract from The New Rulers of the World , by John Pilger, published
by Verso. To order a copy, for £8 plus p&p (rrp £10), call the Observer Books Service on
0870 066 7989.


Madinat al-Muslimeen Islamic Message Board
A R C H I V E S

Individual posts do not necessarily reflect the views of Jannah.org, Islam, or all Muslims. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster and may not be used without consent of the author.
The rest © Jannah.Org